Hi OnFire Folks:

 

I'm back tonight from starting our very first contemporary service. We'll do this monthly in an evening service. For our church of 50, this is pretty significant. We hope this will grow over time and help attract some younger folks to our church. There are always intereting things that happen in new things. Tonight I stripped a tuner on my guitar. One man went home and brought another guitar. It provided for some comedy as I tried various ways of leading the service with and without the broken guitar until he arrived. All in all, it went off very well. I was proud of our youth band who led the music.

 

This week, On Fire turned 1 year old. Thanks for letting me share my thoughts with you.

-------------------------------------------

For the past several weeks, we have been looking at the question, If your church were given a million dollars, how would you like to see it used? Last week I gave some of your responses which illustrated the various decisions to be made by church leadership: to invest or not? tithe or not? programming and/or staffing?

This week we finish off with some responses from people who had vibrant visions of how they would use the money. They had clearly thought about their mission and vision and had a strong sense of direction for their churches. Here are their answers.

I was most impressed by my friend Joseph, who outlined - to the dollar - how he would spend the money on ministry to the poor, to aboriginal youth, non-traditional children’s and youth ministry, and other outreach. He said, "This was fun! I pray someone sends me the money. I am ready!"

For MM, the primary concern was to see the ministry multiplied. "I cannot help but think of the parable of the talents. The primary responsibility of a steward is to multiply the gift. Use it in ways that will grow the kingdom." MM has a vision for that church which will not just increase it incrementally. They are planning a new worship facility to seat 3-4 times their current congregation.

WG thought he would steer his leadership away from their current building fund project to support ways of meeting needs within the area. "I would look for something that would take the church outside of its building and into our community. These would include low rent housing, a low cost laundry mat, or low cost meal centre."

The question hit home for Donna and Rick. They started Sequoia, a church plant in the Ottawa area, and recently completed a campaign which raised over $775 000. She wrote, "Canadians are not flocking into church buildings and so we will change the building." They plan to build a facility which will be a rec centre through the week and worship centre on Sunday.

Community needs were also central to MD’s vision. "I would use it to fuel our community impact project. We want the church building to be central to the community’s needs - youth centre, larger auditorium, coffee and book shop."

The Final Word

Thank you for taking the time to respond to the "million dollar question." I hope it has challenged you to think differently about how to use the money than you might have thought before.

I think there is a bottom line, one thing which is necessary in all of our churches - a clear vision for the future. This gives direction for any spending decisions.

Let me leave you with this quote from a friend. "I don’t think money is enough to save a church, but I believe that most of our churches are paralyzed because of small-mindedness, lack of vision, lack of unity, lack of resources...If a church has prayerful leadership and a heart to partner with what God is doing, having a ‘windfall’ would actually work right into the vision....If, on the other hand, leadership is not clear about why they exist and there is not a united heart and mind moving together in the same direction, money will only complicate things and probably cause more distress, confusion, power struggles, control. Money will choke this kind of church."

Hope this helps. Be On Fire,

 

 

Troy

 

ON FIRE is a weekly letter of encouragement by Troy Dennis. This letter published Jan 29, 2006. www.onfireletter.com